The blue light from the monitor is beginning to sear into my retinas, but the voice coming from the speaker in Chicago is undeterred. There are 22 people on this Zoom call, and 12 of them are muted, likely checking their phones or wondering if they should have ordered Thai food for dinner. The man speaking, a VP of Brand Identity whose tie is probably worth more than my first car, is explaining the ‘Universal Resonance’ of their new tagline. He keeps using the word ‘synergy’ as if it were a physical substance he could smear over the map of East Asia to make the numbers go up.

I’m looking at the slide deck-the 142nd version, according to the file name-and then I’m looking at the translation they’ve forced through a central agency in London. The agency, in its infinite wisdom, has decided that the phrase ‘Raw Power’ should be translated literally into Korean. The result on my screen doesn’t suggest high-end automotive parts or rugged tech. It suggests a very specific, very moist elderly man. It translates, quite literally, to ‘Sweaty Grandpa.’

I try to speak. I clear my throat, a sound that feels like sandpaper against the silence of the 22 participants. I attempt to explain that while ‘raw’ might mean ‘unfiltered’ or ‘powerful’ in a Chicago boardroom, in a Seoul showroom, it sounds like something that needs a shower and a nap. But the VP cuts me off. He tells me about the 32 focus groups they ran in Ohio. He tells me that the brand voice is a ‘sacred pillar’ that cannot be altered for ‘local quirks.’ It is at this moment that I realize localization isn’t a linguistic challenge; it’s a psychological battle against corporate narcissism.

Pierre A.-M., a debate coach I once knew who had the uncanny ability to make people feel intellectually inferior using only his eyebrows, used to say that the greatest error in communication is the assumption that it has taken place. Pierre would have had a field day with this Zoom call. He’d point out that the VP isn’t actually talking to the Korean market; he’s talking to his own reflection in the black glass of the boardroom table. He’s in love with the sound of his own ‘universal’ truth. Pierre once convinced 52 people in a basement in Lyon that the color blue was actually a form of quiet noise, simply by refusing to acknowledge any counter-argument. That is exactly what Chicago is doing now. They are convincing themselves that ‘Sweaty Grandpa’ is a bold, edgy choice because to admit otherwise would be to admit that they don’t own the language of their customers.

❝

The illusion of control is the most expensive line item in a global budget.

We see this everywhere. A 2-billion-dollar beverage company enters a market and wonders why their ‘Friendly and Casual’ tone is being met with stony silence. They don’t realize that in a language with 12 distinct levels of honorifics, being ‘casual’ with a stranger isn’t being friendly; it’s being a jerk. It’s the linguistic equivalent of walking into someone’s house and putting your feet on their dining table. But HQ doesn’t see that. They see a ‘Global Style Guide’ that says ‘We are a peer to our customers.’ They don’t understand that in some places, customers don’t want a peer; they want a provider they can trust.

It requires the humility to say, ‘This word that we love in English makes us look like idiots in 102 other countries.’ But humility is a rare commodity in a building that has its own zip code.

I remember 22 months ago, a tech giant tried to launch a ‘Zen’ campaign in Japan. They used imagery that was actually associated with funeral rites. When the local team pointed this out, the response from the ‘Global Creative Lead’ was: ‘But it tests well for tranquility in San Francisco.’ They ran the ads. They spent 92 million dollars to tell an entire nation that their software was ready for the afterlife. The ego of the center is a blindfold. It’s the refusal to accept that the world is not a mirror, but a prism. One light goes in, but 102 different colors come out the other side.

Pierre A.-M. would often argue that true debate is not about winning, but about finding the ‘point of intersection.’ In marketing, that intersection is where the brand’s DNA meets the customer’s lived reality. If you stay entirely in the brand’s DNA, you’re just talking to yourself. If you stay entirely in the customer’s reality, you lose your identity. Most billion-dollar brands are so terrified of losing their identity that they end up sounding like spam bots. They use phrases that are grammatically correct but emotionally vacant. They are ‘leveraging’ and ‘optimizing’ and ‘disrupting’ in languages that don’t even have direct translations for those corporate buzzwords.

I look back at the Zoom screen. The VP is now showing a graph. The line is going up, but only because the timeframe is 2 weeks long. He’s happy. He thinks the ‘Sweaty Grandpa’ slogan is going to ‘disrupt’ the segment. I think about the fitted sheet again. It’s currently in a wad at the bottom of my closet. I gave up. I just threw a flat sheet over it and hoped for the best. That’s what most localization ends up being-a flat sheet thrown over a mess because the people in charge couldn’t be bothered to learn how the corners work.

There’s a 102 percent chance that this campaign will fail, and when it does, Chicago won’t blame the slogan. They’ll blame the ‘market conditions’ or the ‘local execution.’ They’ll never look in the mirror and realize that the reason they sound like a spam bot is that they’ve programmed themselves to ignore the human nuance of the people they’re trying to reach.

I decide to stay quiet for the rest of the call. Not because I’ve given up, but because I’ve realized that the VP isn’t looking for a solution; he’s looking for an audience. I’ll send a follow-up email in 2 hours, once the caffeine has worn off and I can phrase my dissent in a way that sounds like I’m ‘aligning with the core vision.’ It’s a dance we all do. We pretend the global strategy works, and the global strategy pretends we are all the same.

The problem with being a ‘Global Brand’ is that you eventually forget how to be a local person. You stop looking at the person across the table and start looking at the 232-page report about the person across the table. And in that gap between the data and the human, the ‘Sweaty Grandpa’ is born. It’s a monument to the ego, a testament to the fact that we would rather be ‘consistent’ and wrong than ‘different’ and right.

In the end, the brands that survive aren’t the ones with the biggest ‘Global Playbook.’ They’re the ones with the biggest ears. They are the ones who realize that ‘Sweaty Grandpa’ isn’t a translation error; it’s a symptom of a company that stopped listening 22 years ago. And as I finally manage to get one corner of the sheet to stay in place, I think about how much easier life would be if we all just stopped trying to be ‘Universal’ and started trying to be understood.